Featured work
Standards, put to work.
Content repurposing system
One piece of content in, platform-ready posts out.
The system reads any script, transcript or long-form text, picks out the strongest moments, and scores each one against the standard set for each platform. Anything below the bar is rejected before it reaches you. One moment scored 78 out of 100 for LinkedIn, the top pick. The same moment scored 50 for TikTok and was rejected. Every score comes with a written reason, so you always know why.
The result: a shortlist of posts worth publishing, not a pile to sort through.
One moment · 0:15–1:45
An on-camera diagnosis of why manual reporting is bad for agencies, arguing that it wastes senior staff time and risks client trust.
Scored 78 out of 100Scored78/100
Why this was picked
This names friction agency owners live with weekly — a skilled team member reduced to copy-paste data entry, the fragility of one wrong number in front of a client, and the struggle to make numbers sound like insight rather than a restated spreadsheet. It satisfies the arc requirement because it doesn't stop at the pain: it closes with an explicit reframe/lesson ('The worst part isn't the time... the people doing this are the same people who should be doing the thinking your clients actually pay you for'), which is the insight the reader is left holding, not just the complaint.
Would have scored 50 out of 100Would have scored50/100
Why it did not qualify here
This segment's entire strength is an argued diagnosis of how agency workflows and industry pain points function — it fails the clause 'REJECT segments whose strength is an argued position, a diagnosis or a claim about how the industry works.' There is nothing demonstrable on screen; it's a spoken opinion piece about what's wrong with an approach, not a moment that happens.
Same moment. Two platforms. Two verdicts.
Real output from the system.